Carroll’s Definition Of CSR Breaks CSR

December 6, 2022

Carroll’s Definition Of CSR Breaks CSR

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Carroll’s Definition Of CSR Breaks CSR

[Order Now]

Assignment Brief:

This is an Individual piece of work. The word count should not exceed 3,500 words +/- 10%. Please use Harvard style format with the Time New Roman, 12-font size and double space. You are requested to write as an academic essay. I have uploaded some recommended journal articles related to each topic.(There are 3 articles, and I downloaded and attach to the files) Please remember: the recommended articles must be cited in the essay. Also, you are expected to seek at least 3 additional academic journal articles (non-academic articles are strictly prohibited). Failure to meet the above citation requirements will be deducted 5% of the total grade.

Specific instructions for the assignment:

PART A: Essay (3,000 words)

Your essay should be written as a critical review or debate surrounding your chosen title (e.g. a debate discussing evidence for and against different issues and one view/theory against another). Your discussion should therefore be closely linked to the literature and your reading – not contain what you think! You will be required to write this in ‘academic speak’ which means you should not personalise this writing (do not use I) but write in the third person.

Choose ONE of the following essay topics（have done during the class）:

We live in a knowledge society and the industrialised world no longer has a monopoly on knowledge. Competition for jobs is high and it is suggested that: – Individual Competitiveness (employability) = what you know (your distinctive knowledge/skill) x who you know1 (your networks). Discuss.

Carroll’s definition of CSR breaks CSR into 4 responsibilities: economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic. Discuss and give examples of how HRM can contribute to each type of responsibility within a 21st century organisation. (You should research organisations and give examples to these 4 responsibilities ). (This is the topic I chosen)

Discuss how responsible leadership within HRM could positively influence a climate of authenticity and autonomy within an Organisation.

[Order Now]

PART B: Reflexive Report (500 words)

Answer the following questions:

Why did you choose the specific essay question (subject/topic area) for Part A? (Because choosing the topic was done in class. For me, the main reason I chose this topic is because of interest.)

In your opinion, what is the importance of this subject / topic area for the study of contemporary management and organisations?

How has writing the essay in Part A helped you think differently about organisations, your career and your employment future?

Please notice that in this part, you should use questions directly as sub-titles that would help us to evaluate.

Marking Criteria

Carroll’s Definition Of CSR Breaks CSR

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.