Research Design Assignment And The Mini-Literature Review Assignment

Research Design Assignment And The Mini-Literature Review Assignment

Instructions/Descriptions

Research Design Assignment And The Mini-Literature Review Assignment

[Order Now]

Final Research Proposal

35%

The Final Research Proposal is a polished document that builds on the Research Design assignment and the Mini-Literature Review assignment.

A qualitative research proposal explains what your chosen research topic and research questions are, why it’s worth researching, how it fits into the broader literature, and how you plan to conduct your research. Research Proposals are used to persuade a supervisor that your project is necessary, original, and manageable (given your skillset, resources, and your 1-2 year timeframe).

Outlined below are the sections and content required for a complete research proposal. Every section of a research proposal is meant to be detailed and well supported by academic literature.

Assignment Requirements

For this assignment, please complete the following:

1. Introduction to your topic:

-Provide an interesting introduction to your chosen topic.

-Identify your specific focus (one that is suitable for qualitative inquiry).

-Explain how you arrived at your topic.

-Explain why it is important to conduct research on your topic (the “so what?” of your project).

[Approx. 2-3 paragraphs].

2. Research Questions:

-Identify 1-2 research question(s) that guide your qualitative research project.

-Include these Research Questions in your Introduction.

Note- You may use the same questions from our course’s previous two assignments if you

received feedback that they are well worded and well suited to qualitative research. If not, you

should continue to refine your questions.

[Approx. 0.5 paragraph]

3. Literature Review:

-Introduce and thematically synthesize 5 academic sources (journal articles, academic books,

book chapters) that are relevant to your proposed study. Remember that “thematically

synthesize” means to discuss the articles in relation to one another.

-You can use none, some, or all the content from your Mini-Literature Review assignment

(including exact sentences and paragraphs) if you received positive feedback about your

sources and your synthesis.

-Feel free to replace some of your sources with more up to date or relevant literature, although

this is not required.

– Discuss your proposed research in relation to the existing literature. Explain how your

proposed study differs from or extends the previous research (in terms of focus, goals, scope,

methods, theoretical frameworks).

-Explain what your research will contribute to the field.

[Approx. 3-4 pages]

2

4. Methods:

***Note- This is the most important section and will make up the bulk of your assignment and

the grade for this assignment.***

-Introduce the qualitative method(s) you have selected for your proposed research (i.e, in-depth

interviews, focus-groups, film analysis, legal analysis, document analysis, virtual ethnography,

visual analysis etc.).

-Describe your chosen method(s) (i.e. if you’ve chosen virtual ethnography explain what a

virtual ethnography is with references to course readings and other scholarly sources).

-Justify your choice of method. Why did you choose this method and not another method?

TIP: Draw on the course readings and additional scholarly sources to explain and

justify your selected method(s). Conduct an academic search on your method and cite

literature that explains what that method is all about and why it’s a suitable for your

proposed project. There are many academic journals devoted to qualitative inquiry that

can help with this (i.e. the journals Qualitative Research and Qualitative Inquiry).

-Explain in detail the: what, who, how, and why of your methods.

-What are your sources of data (i.e. transcripts from human participants, movies, blog

posts, case law, legislation… etc.). Be as specific as possible.

-What is the scope of your proposed study (i.e., city of Ottawa, criminal cases from the

last 5 years, Instagram posts from the following 5-10 people over the past 6 months…).

-What are your field sites (i.e. names of specific organizations, places, websites, apps

that actually exist!)

-What are you analyzing (i.e.: name of specific films, Supreme Court cases, Instagram

posts, documents from Department of National Defence…)

-Who are you talking to and why? (i.e. queer youth, students, Crown Attorneys…)

-Who are your gatekeepers (provide actual names and positions. This might involve

some online research of these organizations and their employeers);

-How and where you will recruit? (if this is necessary for your chosen method)

-How will you access your data sources? (i.e. publicly available? join an in-person

group? Lurk on-line?…)

[Order Now]

-How will you analyze your data (i.e. qualitative content analysis, thematic analysis,

discourse analysis, interpretive analysis, narrative analysis)

-Why did you make all of the above methodological choices? Justify each of the above

decisions with references to course readings, scholarly research, lectures.

[Approx. 5-6 pages]

Research Design Assignment And The Mini-Literature Review Assignment

RUBRIC Excellent Quality 95-100%   Introduction 45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Literature Support 91-84  points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. Methodology 58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. Average Score 50-85% 40-38 points More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. 83-76  points There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. 52-49  points The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. Poor Quality 0-45% 37-1 points The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. 75-1 points There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. 48-1 points There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. Research Design Assignment And The Mini-Literature Review Assignment Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/

Research Design Assignment And The Mini-Literature Review Assignment

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!