Harry Hess Theory of Plate Tectonics Case Study

December 5, 2022

Harry Hess Theory of Plate Tectonics Case Study

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Harry Hess Theory of Plate Tectonics Case Study

[Order Now]

Harry Hess of Princeton proposed the theory of plate tectonics. Hess had three main hypotheses that together formed a unified theory of how the Earth works: 1) the Earth is broken into a series of lithospheric plates; 2) the plates are in motion relative to each other, and 3) the crust is formed at ocean ridges and destroyed in subduction zones. Vine-Mattews-Morely came up with the hypothesis that seafloor spreading acts like a magnetic tape recorder (watch the video from Fred Vine).

In everyday use, theory implies something untested (I have a theory or an idea), and having only a small degree of evidence in its favor. However, in science

1) A hypothesis is a tentative explanation for an observation, phenomenon, or scientific problem that can be tested by further investigation. It is “an idea.”

2) A theory is a set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena; theories have been repeatedly tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about natural phenomena.

[Order Now]

Data are observations. In this discussion we want you to list 4 types of geologic data used to test the hypotheses that “the Earth is broken into a series of lithospheric plates.” What data/observations support this? Hint: for some or most of the data, think of large scale topographic features or global geologic trends discussed in the lecture. Note: You can only use one type of data set or observation from Continental Drift.

Harry Hess Theory of Plate Tectonics Case Study

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.