Expert Judgment Essay Assignment Help

December 5, 2022

Expert Judgment Essay Assignment Help

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Expert Judgment Essay Assignment Help

[Order Now]

Scenario 3:

You are the software manager on a new proposed project that requires re-using existing software. What details should you consider and with whom should you coordinate to ensure the proposal is complete and why?

Student 1:

After careful consideration we have decided that the best software estimation method to start the estimation process would be the same as the one used to estimate the re-used existing software. If a computer Model was used, then altering the input for the new specifications of the new project should grant us with an accurate estimate of the new software. In the same manner, if the “Expert Judgment (Delphi)” was used, then the same experts should convey an accurate estimate for the new one.

This is assuming that the software estimation method used for the re-used software granted an accurate estimation. In the situation where it wasn’t, then experience should provide enough input for us to be able to estimate a more accurate estimate. This information would ultimately denote the re-used software manager as the “Expert Judge”, bringing the last method being used as the “Expert Judgment (Delphi)”.

Student 2:

This is my part .In 2 paragraphs i would like to write your comments and thoughts about the above scenario, there is an example for another students to help you start the work. Aslo I will need you response to other post, i will provide them later when they posted.

Expert Judgment Essay Assignment Help

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.