Core Concepts in Health Assignment

December 5, 2022

Core Concepts in Health Assignment

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Core Concepts in Health Assignment

[Order Now]

Textbook: Insel, P. & Roth, W. (2015). Connect core concepts in health (14^th Ed.). New York,

NY: McGraw-Hill Education

———————

In lecture, we examined STDs-their prevalence rates, risk factors, symptoms, how they are transmitted, how you can prevent transmission, and consequences of not getting treated. To further our discussion, answer the following questions:

What was most surprising to you about what you learned about STDs?
How would you feel if you were exposed to a STD? Would it affect how you think about yourself or your partner? Do you think you could take responsibility for obtaining proper treatment and informing your partner(s)?
Should a person’s sexual behavior fit in with their values and life plan? Why or why not?
How does addictions and drug use impact sexual behaviors? Could it lead to contracting STDs?
What role does locus of control have in changing sexual behavior, addiction, and drug use? Why may more help be needed with stopping addiction and drug use?

After submitting your responses, respond to the posts of two of your classmates.

Evaluation: Please see the attached rubric for scoring. You will10pointsfor the number of thoughtful posts you make, a minimum oftwo follow-up posts, distribution of posts (i.e. spread throughout the duration of the discussion board), and clarity/mechanics/netiquette.

—————

-Please note that Professor is too serious about Plagiarism so please make it different.

Core Concepts in Health Assignment

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.