Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Write an 750- to 1,050-word, two-part paper discussing plant and animal adaptations (you are required to complete both Part 1 and Part 2 in the same 750- to 1050-word paper).
Part 1
Choose one plant and one animal living within 40 miles of your current residence (I will provide this). Briefly describe your environment including temperature and precipitation. Identify the biome in which you live.
Describe how your chosen plant has adapted to its current environment. Does the plant use photosynthesis? Does it compete with other plants? How does the plant adjust to temperature extremes? Describe specifically how the plant has adapted.
Describe how your chosen animal has adapted to its current environment. How does it obtain food? How does the animal compensate for temperature extremes? Describe specifically how the animal has adapted.
Part 2
In Part 2, you will transport your chosen plant and animal from Part 1 into a different biome. You may choose any other biome you wish.
Briefly describe the new biome, including temperature and precipitation averages.
Describe how your chosen plant will have to adapt to its new environment. Identify the primary challenges the plant will face. What will be the biggest threats to its survival? What trade-offs would you expect as a result of the new adaptations?
Describe how your chosen animal will have to adapt to its new environment. Identify the primary challenges the animal will face. What will be the biggest threats to its survival? What trade-offs would you expect as a result of the new adaptations?
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.c