Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Some people have been critical of the sex education curriculum taught in schools because it has focused traditionally on biology/anatomy of the human. They argue that a sex education program should include more than a focus on the physical changes. If you had the financial backing, educational support, and freedom to create your own program, then what would you think should be taught to younger people?
Your task will be to create a detailed outline of topics and activities (in other words, the content you will cover and what tasks will you use to aid in the learning and/or evaluation) for the curriculum of a sex education program geared toward young teens (ages 10-14, for example).
As for structure, imagine that you will have about 10 hours of class time devoted to the program (over one month of class meetings). If you decide to exceed that amount of time, then you should provide a clear estimate of the time/length of the program (example; I created a 15-hour program instead of a 10-hour program).
Consider using organization to make it easier. Think about headings like Day, Time Planned, Specific Topics and descriptions, Activities to enhance learning, Evaluation.
Caution: Please make sure to be clear with your entries in terms of labeling and description. An activity such as “discussion” does not really help me with clarity.
After creating your outline, answer the following questions regarding your program in numbered format:
When do you think the program should begin? At what age/grade? For what reason(s)? Would you separate students by sex for their instruction? Provide your reasoning.
Who should do the instruction with the program? What training should they possess, and how can you make certain that their information is up-to-date?
How would you measure the learning/knowledge of the students? In other words, how will you know what they know about sex?
How might you respond to parents that would object to the curriculum that you have planned? Should there be options for attendance in the program?
How would you answer those who suggest that teaching sex education is, basically, giving people an implicit approval for sexual contact?
Make sure to quote and cite as appropriate (and I do not expect students to copy and paste a program already in existence).1 Page
Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/