Psychology Risk & Resilient Factors in A Challenging Time Questions

November 25, 2022

Psychology Risk & Resilient Factors in A Challenging Time Questions

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Psycholog,y Risk, Resilient, Factors, in, A, Challenging, Time, Questions

[Order Now]

Prompt: This project focuses on identifying a challenging time in your life and considering risk and resilient factors that you can apply to this time. Furthermore, many career choices and graduate school admission include an interview, a cover letter, or a personal/diversity statement reflecting on your strengths to overcome struggles, so this will be a good practice to reflect on your life up to this point. Please consider the following questions:

Describe the challenging time that you have selected. Think about your life and try to think of a time when something happened that really changed your life or the kind of person you are. Consider (but feel free to go beyond) these questions:

How old were you at the time of the event? You can choose a past event or something that is currently occurring.

What happened? How did you feel about this time?

Who else was present? How did they feel or react?

How did this event change the way you look at things?

Describe 2 risk factorsfrom the selected experience. How did the risk factors exacerbate/worsen the experience? Below are some examples.
Risk factors
Individual factors (e.g., poor social or problem-solving skills)
Family factors (e.g., low family cohesion, parental psychopathology, low socioeconomic status)
Peer factors (e.g., rejection by peers, victimization)

School factors (e.g., low teacher support, school alienation)

Social/Community factors (e.g., few community supports)

Social-Cultural factors (e.g., socio-historical and political ideologies that lead to stereotypes)

Describe 2 resilient factors from the selected experience. How did the resilient factors mitigate the experience? Below are some examples.

Resilient factors
Individual factors (e.g., sense of self-efficacy)
Family factors (e.g., parental warmth)
Peer factors (e.g., good quality friendship)
School factors (e.g., sense of school belonging)
Social/Community factors (e.g., connection to significant adult)
Social-Cultural factors (e.g., historical events that promote resiliency)

Reference: Masten, A. S., Lucke, C. M., Nelson, K. M., & Stallworthy, I. C. (2021). Resilience in development and psychopathology: Multisystem perspectives. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 17, 521-549.

Professional Plagiarism Free Paper in APA/MLA/Harvard/Turabian Format, Instant Delivery, High Quality Submissions, 100% Unique, Turnitin Report Attached

Psychology Risk & Resilient Factors in A Challenging Time Questions

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.