Order Number |
636738393092 |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Diverse Workforce and Job Enrichment Vs. Job Enlargement
Benefits of a Diverse Workforce
Diversity in the workplace is helpful to both employees and employers. Granted, employees are dependent in their workplace, and cumulative productivity through respecting man or woman variations can be extra beneficial (Beck, 2010).
Particularly in the current time and age where creativity and flexibility are results for competitiveness, diversity is essential for an organization’s success. On the other side, loss of time, money, or any other consequences should not be ignored (Esty et al. 1995).
Organizations have some advantages if they actively practice and support diversity as an economically sound business. Four benefits include generating new principles like a marketing strategy, improving organizational growth, enhancing the businesses’ image and appearance, and hiring reputable human resources employees.
A diverse workforce repeats a changing world and marketplace. A diverse workforce brings high value to corporations. Respecting character differences will advantage the team of workers by growing an aggressive aspect and growing work productivity (Martocchio, 2019).
Diversity management rewards associate through creating a fair and safe environment where everyone has to get entry to possibilities and challenges. Many Workforces are made up of diverse cultures, so corporations need to learn how to adapt to be successful (Howard & Ulferts, 2007).
I have been engaged with diversity in professional ways. I had the honor to work with vendors and customers when working as a sales manager. In my role, I developed an awareness of the cultural differences and traditions of those I worked with and served.
While working with those multi-national companies, I understand the importance of sensitivity to the values and traditions of the co-workers and migrants I served. I educated the philosophy of incorporating business strategies sensitive to a diverse workforce in my day-to-day practice. All these practices with diversity have helped to form my leadership skills and management ethics.
In professional life, I have also been exposed to diversity and worked in several organizations such as Pfizer, Glenmark, and Zydus Cadila. I have been working in a diverse workforce as a manager. I have worked with people of diverse populations, cultural backgrounds, ages, and sexual orientations. We were able to work together as a diverse group of people who familiar and valued individual differences.
Job Enrichment Vs. Job Enlargement.
Job enlargement is the horizontal extension of job roles, whereas enrichment is the vertical expansion of work. Job enlargement means increasing the scope of current work at a similar level through extending the range of responsibilities – For example, increasing the area under the control of an area manager. Here the skill requirement and level of responsibility remain the same.
Job enrichment means improving the quality of work by giving additional responsibilities, typically performed by their manager. For example, a state sales head is made the country sales head. Here additional skills are required since no other state heads will report to them.
The difference between job enrichment and job enlargement is quantity and quality. Job enrichment means development, or progress with the help of progression and development, whereas job enlargement means to add more responsibilities and an increased workload (Martocchio, 2019).
By job enrichment, an employee finds satisfaction for their position and personal growth potential, whereas job enlargement mentions having extra duties and responsibilities in a current job explanation (Marrenbach & Geiger, 2019). Job enlargement is like a vehicle employer use to put the additional workload on employees, perhaps an economic downtime.
Another method that by adding more variety and enlarging the responsibilities will provide the chance of enhancement and more productivity (Chung & Ross, 1977). Job enrichment involves organizing and planning to increase more control over their responsibilities and work as a manager.
Personally speaking, both job enlargement and job enrichment are viewed as motivational tools for the workforce, used by the management. However, the workforce finds that job enrichment is a far great tool than job enlargement.
Job Enrichment gives development, controlling, and decision-making powers to the job holder. It helps them to grow and develop. The job holders feel fulfilled that his tasks have been extended, without knowing that his role and responsibilities are increased (Patten, 1977).
References
Martocchio, J. (2019). Human resource management (15th ed.). Pearson.
Beck, T. (2010). Offering financial education in the workplace benefits both employees and employers. Employment Relations Today, 37(2), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ert.20292
Howard, T. L., & Ulferts, G. W. (2007). The Changing Workforce and Marketplace. Journal of Diversity Management (JDM), 2(4), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.19030/jdm.v2i4.5018
Marrenbach, D., & Geiger, L. (2019). Job rotation, job enlargement, job enrichment. Handbuch Psycho-Soziale Gestaltung Digitaler Produktionsarbeit, 359–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26154-2_27
Chung, K. H., & Ross, M. F. (1977). Differences in Motivational Properties between Job Enlargement and Job Enrichment. The Academy of Management Review, 2(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.2307/257612
Patten, T. H. (1977). Job evaluation and job enlargement: A collision course? Human Resource Management, 16(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930160402
RUBRIC | |||
Excellent Quality
95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Literature Support
91-84 points The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed. |
Methodology
58-53 points With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached. |
Average Score
50-85% |
40-38 points
More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied. |
83-76 points
There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration. |
52-49 points
The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Poor Quality
0-45% |
37-1 points
The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied. |
75-1 points
There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references. |
48-1 points
There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached. |
Place the Order Here: https://standardwriter.com/orders/ordernow / https://standardwriter.com/