Order Number |
6342656776 |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Please respond to the following:
Compare and contrast the differences in the ATOM methodology for large versus small projects. Analyze the key reasons why it is important to address these differences when preparing the initial project plan.
After posting your response, respond to at least one of your classmates on their suggestions.
Please respond to student’s comment below:
Professor and Fellow Classmates,
Understanding the Active Threat and Opportunity Management (ATOM) allows me to see that it can be adjusted to any size or shape of a project. Each project has its uniqueness and has some form of risk.
The ATOM can be customized to meet particular project requirements; smaller projects can take advantage of a cut-down risk process, while larger ones need a more rigorous approach however, other risk methods, ATOM starts with a project scaling step, categorizing each project as Large, Medium or Small (The ATOM Methodology, 1).
The ATOM methodology is designed to target both upside and downsides of risk. The ATOM Methodology has a clear end-point where other risk processes are presented as never-ending cycles going around forever.
ATOM insists on a post-project risk review when the project completes to identify risk-related lessons to be learned for future projects (The ATOM Methodology, 1). It is essential to address multiple size risk of the project during the initial planning phase to ensure the appropriate infrastructure is developed and managed from beginning to end of the project.
After posting your response, respond to at least one of your classmates on their suggestions.
Please respond to student’s comment below:
Professor and Fellow Classmates,
Understanding the Active Threat and Opportunity Management (ATOM) allows me to see that it can be adjusted to any size or shape of a project. Each project has its uniqueness and has some form of risk.
The ATOM can be customized to meet particular project requirements; smaller projects can take advantage of a cut-down risk process, while larger ones need a more rigorous approach however, other risk methods, ATOM starts with a project scaling step, categorizing each project as Large, Medium or Small (The ATOM Methodology, 1).
The ATOM methodology is designed to target both upside and downsides of risk. The ATOM Methodology has a clear end-point where other risk processes are presented as never-ending cycles going around forever.