Mental Illness Discussion and Responses

Mental Illness Discussion and Responses Paper

Instructions/Descriptions

Mental Illness Discussion and Responses Paper

Description

Post 1

here’s 1 Angelo module 1 discussion post liked the context of chapter one, for its design has enabled it to be very informative, giving me a lot of understanding and more insight into the issue of mental disorders. The chapter has elaborated on many aspects related to mental illness and given a lot of insight and even gone further to outline the process of mental disorder.

This is the Identification of mental disorders by giving different professionals different definitions, the history of mental disorders, the assessment and the diagnosis of the issue, the various perspectives of experts on the issue, and the guiding principles.

What I found very interesting was the discussion of the definition of what a mental disorder is. That Mental disorder is the deviation in a person from social expectations. The explanation gave more insight into the definition discussion by giving examples of incidences, an essential tool.

In addition, deeper insights are given in elaborating the different deviations based on the percentage of victims of the citizens in an area. Although the definition has been given, this chapter is special as it has also created room for analyzing the different definitions of mental disorders.

For example, Thomas Szasz argued that mental illness should be the few behavioral problems traceable to organic issues. Jerome Wakefield also gives his definition as dynamic dysfunctions which cause harm. The debate also that is given out on the DSM-5 is excellent.

Although it has received a lot of criticism due to overemphasizing individual dysfunction, it has brought a change that the issue is related to the cultural and social context in some of the disorders. Also, it is interesting how the assessment tools have been elaborated in this chapter.

The use of Life documents related to the milestones or the events in a person’s life concerning school performance, records such as court reports, and medical reports have given more insight into the issue. The tool is effective as it determines how often the problem has occurred in a particular person.

The tool also has been portrayed as a vital tool in the psychological autopsy. The approach of elaborating on the use of interviews as an assessment tool is also great. As argued in the chapter, interviews are the most utilized assessment tools. It is also a tool that is used for the classification of mental disorders.

The tool is termed as very effective as its one of the bridges to getting personal information. Outlining different definitions with different arguments from different professionals is the most effective way of finding and settling on the most appropriate definition for mental disorders.

As mentioned by the different scholars, DSM-5 is not perfect and does not give a chance to check the cultural and social aspects that are a pillar of causing disorders. On the other hand, both the use of life documents and interviews as an assessment tool is vital as they give both the person’s history and a chance to converse with the victim. Hopefully, a new version of the DMS is made and contains cultural and social aspects that can cause disorder since this is very important.

Post 2

Here’s 2 Jaden Understanding Mental Illness – Jaden HurleyCOLLAPSEChapter 1 of the textbook was very eye-opening to me because before reading this chapter I never considered how hard it is to give the term mental disorder a proper definition. Additionally, I also never considered the extent to which ethnicity, gender, and age could affect the diagnosis of a particular patient.

The current and most accurate definition of mental disorder is stated in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), which was published only in 2013 and it includes many aspects of former definitions while also including a new part about emotional regulation and developmental processes (p. 5).

[Order Now]

I was very surprised that the newest definition came out only in 2013 because I always assumed that there was a well-developed and accepted definition of mental disorder well before I was born. Therefore, this proved to me just how hard it is to describe the vast array of mental disorders with one singular umbrella term that can be accurately applied to the many different types of mental disorders.

The fact that the definition makes sure to state that “an expectable or culturally approved response to a common stressor or loss, such as the death of a loved one, is not a mental disorder” is very important because it can help reduce the amount of false positive diagnoses (p. 5).

This means that the definition is trying to make sure clinicians are less likely to diagnose a patient with a disorder that the patient does not actually have. Even though the current definition of the mental disorder appears to try to decrease the amount of false positive diagnoses, they still commonly occur, along with false negative diagnoses as well.

This is especially true because of the biases that occur with cultural differences, ethnicity, gender, and age. For example, I found it interesting that the ethnic background of a patient is very important for a clinician to consider because different cultures have different expressions. These different expressions are important for clinicians to understand so that they do not misconstrue what a patient is trying to say and potentially give the patient a false positive mental disorder diagnosis.

Learning that susto, nervios, and ataque de nervios, which are terms widely used with Hispanic Americans, can affect the way a Hispanic American client presents distress and therefore affect the diagnosis is a bit frightening (p. 29).

This is because it highlights just how sensitive and hard it can be to accurately diagnose a patient with a mental disorder. Additionally, the gender study conducted which resulted in under-diagnosing females of APD and under-diagnosing males of HPD also shows bias through a different type of misdiagnosis called false negative (p. 38).

This study helped show that the gender of a patient could cause a clinician to be less likely to diagnose them with a particular disorder because the disorder is thought to apply more to females rather than males or vice versa. Overall, reading and understanding this chapter showed me that it is important to learn the background and history of mental disorders because of all the changes that occur in this field on a regular basis, like the definition of mental disorder. Therefore, it is important to stay informed about past and present biases, definitions, and classifications that relate to mental disorders.

Post 3

Here’s last Alan Understanding Mental Illness- Alan Guerrero COLLAPSEI enjoyed reading the first chapter of the textbook, Abnormal Psychology 2nd edition by Brian L. Burke, Sarah E. Trost, Terri A. de Roon-Cassini, and Douglas A. Bernstein. This allowed me to dip my toe into what this cause offers and what I can learn from it.

After reading it, I have become more excited to learn things from this course as I know I will learn many more things that I never learned before. In this chapter, we learn more about how to diagnose mental illnesses and what they were. After watching the lecture and reading the textbook there were several things that intrigued me and captured my attention regarding mental disorders.

For instance, I was really surprised by the number of different mental disorders that were diagnosed with the DSM-5. This was rather surprising to me as I never really sat down and thought about how many mental disorders exist. After seeing a list present in the textbook, I was really taken off guard.

[Order Now]

A category of the mental disorders that surprised me was paraphilic disorder. This disorder surprised me because I didn’t know that people who “derive intense and persistent sexual interest from acts or objects other than physically mature, consenting human partners” are counted as people with mental disorders (p26).

Furthermore, this one surprised me because although I thought some “kinks” were strange, I didn’t know they were strange to the point that they would be categorized as mental disorders.  Another thing that really surprised me while reading the textbook was the statistics that were given regarding mental disorders.

In Table 1.5, I was surprised to see so many countries have percentages in the double digits and even worse, close to or even over 50%. This was a surprise to me as I didn’t think it was as common as some of these mental disorders, as mentioned earlier in the textbook, are due to deviation from social expectations.

This is strange as the United States has a 47.4% of its sample population prevalent with mental disorders. However, I do remember that there were limitations to this model; this shows the limitations of this model as a whole as it’s hard to tell what deviates from social expectations if it’s close to half the population. I really enjoyed reading this textbook and learning about mental disorders through the slides and can’t wait for what is to come.

Mental Illness Discussion and Responses Paper

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!