5 Year Financial Statement Design and Analysis

January 21, 2023

5 Year Financial Statement Design and Analysis

Order Number	65354558t564658
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

5 Year Financial Statement Design and Analysis

Create an income statement, a balance sheet, and a cash flow statement for years X1 through X5. You may use any accounting principals that seem appropriate, providing that they are GAAP. Your goal is to maximize the firm’s common stock price at the end of year 5, by making savvy accounting and financial decisions.

PART 1

In this assignment, assume that you are creating actual statements for years X1-X5. You will be graded on how well you do the accounting, the reasonableness of your assumptions and the appearance and “presentation” of your financial statements.

PART 2

As of the end of year five, do a five-year financial analysis of your company. At a minimum level you should calculate 8 or so basic financial ratios. Write a one-page financial analysis that provides a prospective investor with a good overview of the most recent financial results of the company. You will be graded on how well your analysis fits the information from your company.

[Order Now]

5 Year Financial Statement Design and Analysis

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.