5-2 Final Project Milestone Three: Letter to Stakeholder

December 21, 2022

5-2 Final Project Milestone Three: Letter to Stakeholder

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

5-2 Final Project Milestone Three: Letter to Stakeholder

[Order Now]

Description

HCM320 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric Overview: For Milestone Three, you will address the critical elements in the Evaluation of Policy section of your final project and write a letter to the stake holders involved to describe and defend your proposed policy. Stakeholders could include policymakers, healthcare providers, insurers, and healthcare consumers.

Your letter should include background on the key health issue and your assumption of the positive and negative impacts inferred by existing policies (e.g., unintended consequences or public reaction). The document should not be based solely one motion, though it should not be divorced of sentiment, as it needs to rouse the proper energy to effect change. The goal of the document is to convince the reader that your proposed policy will improve the U.S. healthcare system in terms of quality, costs, and accessibility.

Submit your analysis in a letter format that you may use to develop speaker’s notes for your final presentation.

Prompt: Write a letter to a stake holder to describe and defend your proposed policy. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

I. Evaluation of Policy:

A. Discuss the current economic and legal landscape related to your public health issue. To what extent do existing policies (or the lack there of) have positive or negative impacts to the American healthcare system?

B. Explain your proposed policy using evidence and examples to illustrate.

1. What are the specific operational strategies that you believe are necessary for addressing your chosen issue and why ?

2. What role do the major healthcare organizations play in your proposed policy? To what extent can their position in the marketplace be harnessed?

C. Defend your proposed policy for addressing the public health issue with specific research and evidence.

1.How will your proposed public policy improve the American health care system interns of healthcare quality, costs, and accessibility?

2. In what ways is your proposed policy informed by the larger socioeconomic factors that can influence public health? Rubric Guidelines for Submission:

Your paper must be submitted as a 2-to3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing,

12-point Times New Roman font, one- inch margins and at least three sources cited in APA format.

My public health issue that I had chosen is on childhood obesity.

[Order Now]

5-2 Final Project Milestone Three: Letter to Stakeholder

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.