448W6 Legal Entanglement Project

January 23, 2023

448W6 Legal Entanglement Project

Order Number	653656367534356
Type of Project	ESSAY/DISERTATION
Writer Level	PHD/MASTERS CERTIFIED
Format	APA/MLA/HARVARD/OXFORD
Academic Sources	10 -20
Page Count	4-8 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

448W6 Legal Entanglement Project: Part 3 Research Paper Assignment

Conflicts of interest between FAA certification process and aircraft manufacturers (Boeing 737 Max for example)

Part 3 – Research Paper – You have been invited to the 26th annual Christians in Aviation Conference where numerous industry professionals will be attending to learn more about recent developments in aviation law and a Biblical worldview of same. You have been asked to prepare a presentation to give at the conference (discussed in next assignment) and prior to your topic being approved, you need to provide a paper that provides an overview of your presentation. The paper should include:

1) an introduction;

2) background of the topic;

3) differing viewpoints on the topic;

4) analysis of the most relevant controlling case law and updates as to where the topic currently stands,

5) your opinion of what the appropriate solution to the problem is and to the extent able, how the Bible speaks to the issues presented; 6) your practical recommendations to industry professionals that may be impacted by the issue; and

7) a brief conclusion.

The headers do not need to match the topics mentioned above but each section should be clearly delineated to reference these categories. Be sure to properly cite your sources. This assignment should be between 6-10 pages exclusive of title and reference pages.

Note: Your assignments will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

[Order Now]

448W6 Legal Entanglement Project

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.