MGT530 Operations Management and Productivity

December 15, 2022

MGT530 Operations Management and Productivity

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

[Order Now]

MGT530 Operations Management and Productivity

Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 2

Exceeds Expectation

Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence

Content, Research, and Analysis

21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points

Requirements Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points

[Order Now]

Content Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the materials, with no errors or major omissions.

Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the materials; may include some minor errors or omissions.

Demonstrates fair knowledge of the materials and/or includes some major errors or omissions.

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and/or includes many major errors or omissions.

25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points

Analysis Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

Provides poor though, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points

Sources go above and beyond required criteria and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Sources meet required criteria but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

Mechanics and Writing

5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 1-2 Points

Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure, contains no errors in grammar, spelling,

Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure, may include a few

Project is poorly organized and written and may not follow proper format as outlined in the assignment. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development,

Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar, spelling, APA style,

MGT530 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 2

APA style, or APA citations and references.

minor errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.

and/or includes numerous or major errors in grammar, spelling, APA style or APA citations and references.

and APA citations and references.

Total points possible = 100

MGT530 Operations Management and Productivity

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.