Prescribed Drugs with CAMs Case Study

December 14, 2022

Prescribed Drugs with CAMs Case Study

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

Prescribed Drugs with CAMs Case Study

Prescribed, Drugs, CAMs, Case, Study

Case Study: Prescribed Drugs with CAMs

A 35-year-old male, Mr. NX, presents to your clinic today with complaints of back pain and “just not feeling good.” Regarding his back, he states that his back pain is a chronic condition that he has suffered with for about the last 10 years. He has not suffered any specific injury to his back. He denies weakness of the lower extremities, denies bowel or bladder changes or dysfunction, and denies radiation of pain to the lower extremities and no numbness or tingling of the lower extremities. He describes the pain as a constant dull ache and tightness across the low back.

He states he started a workout program about 3 weeks ago. He states he is working out with a friend who is a body builder. He states his friend suggested taking Creatine to help build muscle and Coenzyme Q10 as an antioxidant so he started those medications at the same time he began working out. He states he also takes Kava Kava for his anxiety and garlic to help lower his blood pressure.

His historical diagnoses, currently under control, are:

Type II diabetes since age 27

High blood pressure

Recurrent DVTs

His prescribed medications include:

Glyburide 3 mg daily with breakfast

Lisinopril 20 mg daily

Coumadin 5 mg daily

Directions:

Present this Assignment as a PowerPoint presentation with at least 10 slides

Be sure to complete the assignment as the NP treating this family, not as a third party.

You will use the Narrative notes section of the presentation to include the majority of your evidentiary support of your treatment choices and education of family complete with in-text citations using APA formatting, remember if you use photos from outside sources, they must be cited below within the Power Point.

Be sure to complete the assignment as the NP treating this family, not as a third party

Create a COMMUNICATION PLAN (how patient is going to carry out treatment, not the same as a treatment plan) for mother and child for both prescriptive and non-prescriptive drug therapies.

You will create a treatment plan for pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic intervention. For any medications you would use, you must provide rational for your choice including discussion of kinetics and dynamics of the drugs.

LINK TO BOOK

Pharmacotherapeutics for NP Prescribers

Chapter 8: “An Introduction to Pharmacogenomics”

Chapter 10: “Herbal and Nutritional Supplements”

Chapter 13: “Over-the-counter Medications”

https://books.google.com/books?id=WFKSDgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=pharmacotherapeutics+for+advanced+practice+nurse+prescribers+ebook&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwisw6bOtcLnAhWDbs0KHU5-DVMQ6AEwBnoECAgQAg#v=onepage&q&f=false

PLEASE READ EVERYTHING CAREFULLY. MAKE SURE TO FOLLOW POST AS WELL AS RUBRIC. NO PLAGIARISM WILL BE ACCEPTED

[Order Now]

Prescribed Drugs with CAMs Case Study

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.