UWF M8 Data Visualization Using Excel 3 D Maps Paper

December 14, 2022

UWF M8 Data Visualization Using Excel 3 D Maps Paper

Order Number	636738393092
Type of Project	ESSAY
Writer Level	PHD VERIFIED
Format	APA
Academic Sources	10
Page Count	3-12 PAGES

Instructions/Descriptions

UWF M8 Data Visualization Using Excel 3 D Maps Paper

UWF, M8, Data, Visualization, Using, Excel, 3 D, Maps, Paper

Demonstrate proficiency with data visualization using the 3D Maps feature in Microsoft Excel

Access Microsoft Excel

Resources:

Excel-Accessing-UWF.docx

First, use the resource above to familiarize yourself with how to access Microsoft Excel at UWF.

NOTE: To complete the 3D Maps assignments in this course, you will need to access a Windows version of Excel (version 2016 or higher).

WATCH AND LEARN HELPFUL VIDEOS FOR ARGOAPPS USERS:

Transferring Excel files to ArgoApps (Links to an external site.)

Practice with creating 3D maps in Microsoft Excel

Resources:

Excel-3DMaps-Intro-Practice.docx

Next, if you are new to data visualization features in Microsoft Excel, use the practice exercises provided to create some basic maps. Step-by-step guidance is provided.

These practices exercises are an important use of your time – completing them will help you meet the requirements in the assignment below.

WATCH AND LEARN HELPFUL VIDEOS FOR PRACTICE (Using Pizza Data)

Creating a 3D map (Links to an external site.)

3D Maps: Plotting with stacked columns (Links to an external site.)

3D Maps: Plotting with bubbles (Links to an external site.)

Creating a data tour in Excel (Links to an external site.)

Finishing touches for data tour (Links to an external site.)

[Order Now]

UWF M8 Data Visualization Using Excel 3 D Maps Paper

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The context and relevance of the issue, as well as a clear description of the study aim, are presented. The history of searches is discussed.

Methodology

58-53 points

With titles for each slide as well as bulleted sections to group relevant information as required, the content is well-organized. Excellent use of typeface, color, images, effects, and so on to improve readability and presenting content. The minimum length criterion of 10 slides/pages is reached.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/information is required for the context and importance, otherwise the study detail will be unclear. There is no search history information supplied.

83-76 points

There is a review of important theoretical literature, however there is limited integration of research into problem-related ideas. The review is just partly focused and arranged. There is research that both supports and opposes. A summary of the material given is provided. The conclusion may or may not include a biblical integration.

52-49 points

The content is somewhat ordered, but there is no discernible organization. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on may sometimes distract from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The context and/or importance are lacking. There is no search history information supplied.

75-1 points

There has been an examination of relevant theoretical literature, but still no research concerning problem-related concepts has been synthesized. The review is just somewhat focused and organized. The provided overview of content does not include any supporting or opposing research. The conclusion has no scriptural references.

48-1 points

There is no logical or apparent organizational structure. There is no discernible logical sequence. The use of typeface, color, graphics, effects, and so on often detracts from the presenting substance. It is possible that the length criteria will not be reached.