Order Number |
76785767776A |
Type of Project |
ESSAY |
Writer Level |
PHD VERIFIED |
Format |
APA |
Academic Sources |
10 |
Page Count |
3-12 PAGES |
Describe the activities associated with incident termination.
As best described by Noll and Hildebrand, the 8thstep of Incident management is the termination process. This process begins the journey to a certain level of normalcy post a hazardous material incident regardless of the size and magnitude. Termination consist of demobilizing the emergency crews and it commences the clean up, restoration and recovery efforts. This process has to be formally declared and the involvement of the agencies that will be taking over has to be properly documented. The IC has to transfer command to the PERO Incident Commander as the players will shift their focus to clean up, point of contact as well as post-incident debriefing.
Describe the transferring responsibility of the incident scene – compare and contrast two differing events, i.e. only local resources actively involved, multi-state resources involved.
Post incident, transferring the scene is not only part of the 8thstep but it’s a crucial time that must be documented. The players change and the focus of the mission shifts from recovery to reinstatement. In the event of a dwelling fire, which I am going to utilize as part of my local response. After the fire has been extinguished, the job of the fire department is not over. The fire scene is transferred to the Fire Marshall which will make determinations and will investigate causes such as electrical problems of foul play. The FM releases the scene to the Community Assistance Team (CAT team,) who works with the residents and might request other agencies such as Red Cross for displaced occupants or Red Paw for animals needing housing. While a Multi-Agency response is more extensive. As we saw with Deep Water Horizon, the release of a hazard material which in that case was crude oil, sparked a nationwide response. The Multi-Agency effort had too many hands in the pot, therefore it is important to follow checklist and the ICS framework. D.W.H., started with the the local emergency response team onboard the rig, once they realize the severity of the incident, additional help was requested. A collected effort between Transocean Offshore drilling, EPA, USCG, FEMA, OSHA and Department of state where among some of the few that participated. Furthermore, the purpose of this post is to talk about the incident scene transfer efforts. Most of the clean up efforts where performed by USCG and contractors, which of course where paid by BP via fines and contractional billing.
According to Noll and Hildebrand, “The purpose of the incident debriefing in the field is to provide accurate information concerning the hazards and risk involved directly to the people who may have been exposed, contaminated, or in some way affected by the response.” (Noll, 2014) The debriefing process should be systematic, factual, purposeful, and topics should be passed on, in order of importance. This approach will allow the response team to state what steps where done and the receiving personnel will have a better understanding of what transpire during the response. The second portion of the debrief is associated with lessons learned, evaluation of equipment used and its effectiveness as well as short-coming as a team without blaming individuals. This is by far the hardest part for emergency responders to do, due to the vulnerability associated with it. The mission approach and actions taken after the effectiveness is evaluated should be implemented and incorporated into future events. My approach on lessons learned into lessons implemented starts with self accountability. Rome was not built in one day; therefore, every little event/call should be a learning experience that you implement in your next call. The name of the game is to attempt to have a flawless event but in this line of business which is very dynamic and filled unforeseen circumstances, previous event paved the way for SOG’s, SOP’s, checklist and other necessary tools.
Reference:
Noll, Hilderbrand, and Yvossa. 2019. Hazardous material: Managing the incident (4th ed.)